Question Description
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
https://aspe.hhs.gov/report/literature-review-and-…
A. Discuss personal health records by doing the following:
1. Provide a definition of personal health records.
2. Identify and discuss three benefits of personal health records.
3. Analyze methods to protect personal health records.
B. Discuss patient portals by doing the following:
1. Provide a definition of a patient portal.
2. Discuss the benefits of patient portals.
3. Identify five data elements that may be accessed using a patient portal and explain how these elements contribute to care quality.
4. Identify and explain three functions that may be performed using a patient portal.
C. Contrast personal health records and patient portals by doing the following:
1. Analyze the differences between personal health records and patient portals.
D. Discuss personal health records models by doing the following:
1. Compare the benefits and weaknesses of three models of personal health records.
Note: Please refer to the weblink “PHR Elements and Functions” to inform your comparison.
2. Select and recommend a personal health records model and then justify your recommendation.
E. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
F. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
RUBRIC
NOT EVIDENT A definition of personal health records is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The definition of personal health records is inaccurate or does not demonstrate a full understanding of the concept. |
COMPETENT An accurate definition of personal health records is provided that demonstrates a full understanding of the concept. |
A2:BENEFITS OF PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS
NOT EVIDENT 3 benefits of personal health records are neither identified nor discussed. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE A thorough discussion of 3 benefits of personal health records is provided, but 1 or more of the benefits discussed are not feasible or are not accurate. |
COMPETENT A thorough discussion of 3 benefits of personal health records is provided, and each of the benefits discussed are feasible and accurate. |
A3:METHODS TO PROTECT PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not analyze methods to protect personal health records. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission analyzes methods to protect personal health records, but the analysis is not thorough or plausible. Or the methods of protecting the records are unfeasible or ineffective. |
COMPETENT The submission analyzes feasible and effective methods to protect personal health records, and the analysis is thorough and plausible. |
B1:DEFINITION OF PATIENT PORTALS
NOT EVIDENT A definition of a patient portal is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The definition of a patient portal is inaccurate or does not demonstrate a full understanding of the concept. |
COMPETENT An accurate definition of a patient portal is provided that demonstrates a full understanding of the concept. |
B2:BENEFITS OF PATIENT PORTALS
NOT EVIDENT Benefits of patient portals are not discussed. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The discussion of the benefits of patient portals is not thorough, or the discussed benefits are neither feasible nor accurate. |
COMPETENT The discussion of the benefits of patient portals is thorough, and the discussed benefits are feasible and accurate. |
B3:DATA ELEMENTS
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not identify or explain 5 data elements that may be accessed using a patient portal. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission identifies 5 data elements that may be accessed using a patient portal, but 1 or more of the data elements are inaccurate. Or the submission does not include a well-detailed explanation of how each of the 5 data elements contribute to care quality. |
COMPETENT The submission identifies 5 accurate data elements that may be accessed using a patient portal, and it includes a well-detailed explanation of how each of the 5 data elements contribute to care quality. |
B4:FUNCTIONS PERFORMED
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not identify or explain 3 functions that may be performed using a patient portal. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission identifies 3 functions that may be performed using a patient portal, but 1 or more of the functions are inaccurate or inappropriate. Or the submission does not accurately explain how each of these 3 functions are performed. |
COMPETENT The submission identifies 3 accurate and appropriate functions that may be performed while using a patient portal, and it accurately explains how each of these 3 functions are performed. |
C1:CONTRAST ANALYSIS
NOT EVIDENT An analysis of the differences between personal health records and patient portals is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The analysis of the differences between personal health records and patient portals is not accurate or thorough. |
COMPETENT The analysis of the differences between personal health records and patient portals is accurate and thorough. |
D1:PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS MODELS
NOT EVIDENT A comparison of 3 health records models is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE 3 models of personal health records are compared, but the comparison does not include accurate benefits and weaknesses of each model. |
COMPETENT 3 models of personal health records are compared, including an accurate comparison of the benefits and weaknesses of each model. |
D2:PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS RECOMMENDATION
NOT EVIDENT A personal health record model is not recommended. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The recommendation of a personal health record model is inappropriate, or it does not include a plausible justification for why this model was chosen. |
COMPETENT The recommendation of a personal health record model is appropriate, and it includes a plausible justification for why this model was chosen. |
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. |
COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. |
NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. |
COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
