Question Description
I’m working on a law case study and need a sample draft to help me learn.
- Facts.
The background story: what happened in the real world to cause the parties to go to court to resolve their dispute.
- Law.
References to relevant legal principles, precedent, statutes, the Constitution, or other sources of guidance for determining the outcome of the case.
- Analysis.
Weaving together of facts and relevant law, as the judge decides the outcome of the case (holding) and explains the reasoning.
- Resolution.
The ruling of the court.The ruling of the court.A Question of Ethics—Free Speech. Michael Mayfield, the president of Mendo Mill and Lumber Co., in California, received a “notice of a legal claim” from Edward Starski. The “claim” alleged that a stack of lumber fell on a customer as a result of a Mendo employee’s “incompetence.” The “notice” presented a settlement offer on the customer’s behalf in exchange for a release of liability for Mendo. In a follow-up phone conversation with Mayfield, Starski said that he was an attorney—which, in fact, he was not. Starski was arrested and charged with violating a state criminal statute that prohibited the unauthorized practice of law. [ People v. Starski, 7 Cal.App.5th 215, 212 Cal.Rptr.3d 622 (1 Dist. Div. 2 2017)] (See Business and the Bill of Rights.)
- Starski argued that “creating an illusion” that he was an attorney was protected by the First Amendment. Is Starski correct? Explain.
- Identify, discuss, and resolve the conflict between the right to free speech and the government’s regulation of the practice of law
- please dont forget to put worked cited and apply the MLA Format
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."