Question Description
A. Discuss privacy and security concerns that are inherent in mobile technology (mHealth) by doing the following:
1. Define mHealth.
2. Analyze two risks of using mHealth.
3. Analyze two benefits of using mHealth.
4. Discuss the legal and ethical considerations of a healthcare organization using mHealth.
5. Analyze two modifications that have been made to HIPAA to address mHealth.
B. Discuss one method of delivering training on ensuring the security and confidentiality of health data when using mHealth for each of the following groups:
C. Create a multimedia presentation (e.g., Microsoft PowerPoint, Apple Keynote) in which you outline an implementation plan for the training sessions discussed in part B for the executive team of a healthcare organization. Your presentation should do the following:
1. Explain the importance of delivering the training, including the risks of not delivering the training.
2. Identify the key members of the implementation team, and explain why they are key members.
3. Summarize the stages of the implementation plan for delivering training to physicians and nursing and ancillary staff.
4. Explain one barrier or resistance to attending security and confidentiality training sessions for each of the following groups:
5. Recommend one method to resolve each barrier explained in part C4.
D. Provide a link to a 10–15 minute audiovisual recording of yourself that incorporates your multimedia presentation. (I can record myself but if there can be notes added on the presentation)RUBRIC
NOT EVIDENT A definition of mHealth is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The definition of mHealth is inaccurate or does not demonstrate a full understanding of the concept. |
COMPETENT An accurate definition of mHealth is provided that demonstrates a full understanding of the concept. |
A2:RISKS TO USING MHEALTH
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not analyze 2 risks to using mHealth. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission analyzes 2 risks of using mHealth, but the risks are not feasible, or either of the risks do not have to do with privacy or security concerns. Or the analysis does not include specific examples of why both risks could pose further issues. |
COMPETENT The submission analyses 2 feasible risks of using mHealth. Both risks have to do with privacy or security concerns, and the analysis includes specific examples of why both risks could pose further issues. |
A3:BENEFITS OF USING MHEALTH
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not analyze 2 benefits of using mHealth. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission analyzes 2 benefits of using mHealth, but either of the benefits are not appropriate or relevant. Or the analysis does not include specific examples. |
COMPETENT The submission analyzes 2 appropriate and relevant benefits of using mHealth, and the analysis includes specific examples. |
A4:LEGAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not discuss the legal and ethical consideration of a healthcare organization using mHealth. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission discusses the legal and ethical considerations for a healthcare organization using mHealth, but the discussion is illogical or does not include specific examples. |
COMPETENT The submission discusses the legal and ethical considerations of a healthcare organization using mHealth, and the discussion is logical and includes specific examples. |
A5:HIPAA MODIFICATIONS
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not analyze 2 modifications that have been made to HIPAA to address mHealth. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission analyzes 2 modifications that have been made to HIPAA to address mHealth, but either of the modifications are inaccurate. Or the analysis is not logical or thorough. |
COMPETENT The submission accurately analyzes 2 modifications that have been to HIPAA to address mHealth, and the analysis is logical and thorough. |
B:DELIVERY OF TRAINING
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not discuss 1 method of delivering training to any of the given groups. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission discusses 1 method of delivering training to each of the given groups, but the method discussed for 1 or more of the groups is inappropriate or ineffective. Or 1 or more of the methods does not include considerations for both the day and night shifts for each group. |
COMPETENT The submission discusses 1 appropriate and effective method of delivering training to each of the given groups, including day and night shifts. |
C:MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION
NOT EVIDENT A multimedia presentation is not provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The presentation lacks cohesive organization and flow. The presentation’s layout features (e.g., text, graphics, multimedia, presenter notes) are missing or are not used appropriately for the given audience. |
COMPETENT The presentation is well organized, logical, and easy to follow. The presentation layout is professional and makes appropriate use of text, graphics, multimedia, and presenter notes for the given audience. |
C1:MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING
NOT EVIDENT The multimedia presentation does not explain the importance of delivering the training or the risks of not delivering the training. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The multimedia presentation explains the importance of delivering the training to all staff, but the explanation is illogical, or the explanation does not include the risks of not delivering the training, or the risks are not relevant or plausible. |
COMPETENT The multimedia presentation includes a logical explanation of the importance of delivering the training to all staff and an explanation of relevant and plausible risks of not delivering the training. |
C2:MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: KEY MEMBERS
NOT EVIDENT The multimedia presentation neither identifies the key members of the implementation team nor explains why they are key members. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The multimedia presentation identifies members of the implementation team, but 1 or more of the key members of the team are missing. Or 1 or more of the identified members are inappropriate. Or the explanation does not address plausible reasons for why these members are key members of the implementation team. |
COMPETENT The multimedia presentation identifies all appropriate members of the implementation team and explains plausible reasons for why these members are key members. |
C3:MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: STAGES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
NOT EVIDENT The summary does not include any stages of the implementation plan. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The summary is missing 1 or more of essential stages of the implementation plan, or 1 or more of the stages are inappropriate. Or the physicians, nursing staff, or ancillary staff’s involvement is missing from 1 or more of the stages. |
COMPETENT The summary addresses all of the essential stages of the implementation plan, and the stages are appropriate. Each stage involves the physicians, the nursing staff, and the ancillary staff. |
C4:MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: BARRIERS
NOT EVIDENT The summary does not explain barriers or resistance to attending training sessions. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The summary explains barriers or resistance to attending security and confidentiality training sessions, but the barriers are illogical. Or the explanation does not address barriers for each of the listed groups. |
COMPETENT The summary explains logical barriers or resistance to attending security and confidentiality training sessions for each of the listed groups. |
C5:MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION: BARRIER RESOLUTION
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include recommendations for how the barriers in part C4 could be resolved. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission recommends methods to resolve barriers, but the methods are inappropriate or would not be able to be logically implemented. Or a recommendation is not provided for each of the barriers explained in part C4. |
COMPETENT The submission recommends appropriate methods to resolve barriers for each of the barriers explained in part C4, and each recommendation would be able to be logically implemented. |
D:PANOPTO LINK AND AUDIOVISUAL RECORDING
NOT EVIDENT Neither a Panopto link nor an audiovisual recording is provided. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE A Panopto link is provided, but it is not accessible, or the presentation is not visibly delivered by the candidate, or the recording does not show both the candidate and the multimedia presentation. |
COMPETENT The Panopto link is correct and accessible. The presentation is visibly delivered by the candidate, and the recording shows both the candidate and the multimedia presentation. |
D1:PRESENTATION DELIVERY
NOT EVIDENT The presentation delivery does not demonstrate professionalism, confidence, or strong and clear communication and presentation skills. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The presentation delivery demonstrates professionalism, confidence, or strong and clear communication and presentation skills, but 1 or more of these aspects are inappropriate for an executive audience. |
COMPETENT The presentation delivery demonstrates professionalism, confidence, and strong and clear communication and presentation skills, and each of these aspects is appropriate for an executive audience. |
NOT EVIDENT The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style. |
COMPETENT The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style. |
NOT EVIDENT Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. |
APPROACHING COMPETENCE Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. |
COMPETENT Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |
"Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you "A" results."
